Skip to content
Leading Supplier of Premium Phone Part's
Leading Supplier of Premium Phone Part's
iPhone 17 vs iPhone 16 Water Resistance Test: What's Changed?

iPhone 17 vs iPhone 16 Water Resistance Test: What's Changed?

Every time Apple releases a new iPhone, people wonder if the water resistance actually improved or if it's just the same technology with a new marketing spin. The jump from iPhone 16 to iPhone 17 probably won't be revolutionary when it comes to water protection, but there might be some subtle improvements worth talking about.

Apple's been stuck at the same IP68 rating for like four generations now - iPhone 13, 14, 15, 16 all claim the same 6 meters for 30 minutes thing. At this point, they've hit the practical limits of what you can do in a thin phone without making it thick and ugly like those rugged construction worker phones.

iPhone 16 Water Resistance Baseline

iPhone 16 has IP68 which sounds impressive until you realize that's been standard on flagship phones for years now. In Apple's lab with pure water at controlled temperatures, yeah it survives 6 meters deep for 30 minutes, but nobody uses their phone in laboratory conditions.

Real world? iPhone 16 handles rain fine, survives getting splashed at the sink, probably lives through a quick toilet drop if you're fast. But taking it swimming or using it underwater regularly is still playing with fire despite what those two letters and two numbers claim.

Expected iPhone 17 Water Resistance Specifications

All the leaks I've seen suggest iPhone 17 keeps the same IP68 rating as iPhone 16, which is honestly kind of disappointing but not surprising. Apple's probably making small improvements to gaskets and seals that won't change the official rating but might make the phone slightly more reliable when it gets wet.

Some random leak claimed iPhone 17 might go deeper or last longer underwater, but I'm calling BS until we see actual proof. Apple would totally brag about improved specs if they had them - the fact that rumors are vague suggests nothing major changed.

Seal and Gasket Technology Improvements

The real improvements between iPhone 16 and 17 are probably happening with boring stuff like better rubber compounds and more precise manufacturing tolerances. You can't see these changes just looking at the phone, but they might mean iPhone 17's seals last longer before degrading.

After a year of daily use, temperature cycling, and normal wear, iPhone 17 might maintain better water resistance than iPhone 16 does at the same age. That's useful but not exactly the exciting upgrade people are hoping for when they drop over a grand on a new phone.

USB-C Port Water Resistance Evolution

Both phones have USB-C ports which are honestly harder to seal properly than the old Lightning port was. The USB-C connector is more complex with more pins and tighter tolerances, giving water more ways to sneak inside if the seals aren't perfect.

Apple's had a full year making iPhone 16 with USB-C, so maybe they learned some tricks for sealing it better on iPhone 17. Tiny changes to internal port geometry or better water-repellent coatings could help without changing what the port looks like from the outside.

Speaker and Microphone Mesh Improvements

Speaker grilles are always weak spots because sound needs to get through but water shouldn't. Both phones use super fine mesh to block water while letting sound pass, but the mesh material and coatings might be slightly better on iPhone 17.

These improvements are totally invisible to users but could actually matter when your phone gets splashed. Better hydrophobic coatings mean water beads up and rolls off instead of soaking into the mesh and potentially getting inside.

Display Adhesive and Edge Sealing

The glue holding your screen on is basically the most important seal on the whole phone. If that adhesive fails or if there's a tiny gap at the edge, water's getting in no matter how good the port seals are.

iPhone 17 might use stronger adhesive or apply it more precisely than iPhone 16, improving edge sealing where most water intrusion actually happens. Manufacturing improvements that create more consistent gaps and better adhesive application across millions of units would help reliability without changing the IP rating.

Button and Switch Sealing Refinements

Every physical button is a potential leak point because something has to move through the body of the phone. Volume buttons, power button, Action button - they all need seals that prevent water from following the button mechanism inside.

If iPhone 17 refined those button seals even slightly, it'd be harder for water to intrude around the buttons during use. You'd never notice this visually, but it might mean the difference between your phone surviving or dying when you drop it in water.

Testing Methodology and Real Results

Eventually some YouTube tech channel will dunk both iPhone 16 and 17 in fish tanks side by side to see which dies first. These videos are entertaining but don't really prove much because they're testing brand new phones with fresh seals under one specific scenario.

I'm guessing iPhone 17 performs basically the same as iPhone 16 in these tests because the official specs are identical. Maybe iPhone 17 averages slightly better results across multiple units due to better manufacturing consistency, but we're talking small margins here.

Saltwater Resistance Comparison

Neither phone is designed for saltwater despite both having IP68 ratings - Apple specifically warns against ocean use. Saltwater corrodes electronics way faster than fresh water, and even if water doesn't fully penetrate, salt residue on seals causes problems.

If iPhone 17 uses different gasket materials that resist salt corrosion better, it might survive ocean exposure slightly better than iPhone 16. But "slightly better" still means you shouldn't deliberately use either phone at the beach or in the ocean without a waterproof case.

Pool and Chlorine Water Performance

Chlorine from pools eats away at rubber seals over time, degrading water resistance faster than pure water would. Taking your iPhone swimming regularly is basically accelerating seal degradation even if the phone survives each individual pool session fine.

Any improvements in iPhone 17's seal materials might help them resist chlorine damage better than iPhone 16's seals do. But neither phone is really designed for regular swimming despite people doing it all the time and usually getting away with it.

Hot Water and Temperature Resistance

Hot tubs and hot showers exceed the temperature specs for IP68 ratings on both phones. Heat makes rubber seals expand and lose effectiveness, plus hot water with chemicals is extra aggressive at degrading seals quickly.

There's probably zero difference between iPhone 16 and 17 when it comes to hot water because both use similar materials that hate high temperatures. Using either phone in a hot tub is dumb regardless of what IP rating it claims - you're just asking for water damage.

Pressure Resistance from Water Jets

IP ratings measure static submersion, not water pressure from showers or faucets spraying directly at the phone. Both iPhone 16 and 17 probably handle water pressure similarly since their port and seal designs are basically the same.

Direct water spray can force water past seals that would hold fine against still water at depth. People take iPhones into showers all the time without issues, but you're technically exceeding what the IP rating actually protects against when water's actively spraying at the ports.

Longevity of Water Resistance Over Time

Brand new phones fresh from the factory have the best water resistance possible - then it's downhill from there as seals age. The question is whether iPhone 17's seals degrade slower than iPhone 16's seals do over months of daily use.

Better seal materials would mean iPhone 17 maintains water resistance longer, which matters way more than peak performance when new. Your phone needs to resist water after six months in your pocket, not just when it's fresh from the box.

Impact of Repairs on Water Resistance

Getting either phone repaired basically destroys the original water resistance, especially if some mall kiosk does it without proper sealing equipment. Even Apple's official repairs probably don't restore full water resistance because the original factory seals are broken.

No difference between iPhone 16 and 17 here - once you crack the seal opening either phone, the water resistance is compromised. Screen replacements are the worst because they break the critical edge seal where most water intrusion happens.

Case Compatibility and Water Resistance

Cases can either help or hurt water resistance depending on the design. Some cases block ports creating areas where water can pool, while others add extra protection that actually improves practical water resistance beyond what the naked phone provides.

Since iPhone 16 and 17 have nearly identical dimensions, cases fit both similarly and probably affect water resistance the same way. A case that creates water traps on iPhone 16 will create the same problems on iPhone 17.

Warranty Coverage Differences

Apple's warranty doesn't cover water damage on either phone despite both having IP68 ratings - that's been consistent forever. Water resistance is marketed as a feature but isn't a warranty guarantee, and liquid contact indicators inside both phones will void coverage if triggered.

There's literally zero difference in warranty terms between models when it comes to water damage. Your phone gets wet and stops working? You're paying for repairs or replacement regardless of how careful you were or whether it should have survived based on the IP rating.

Real-World User Experiences

Most iPhone 16 owners report the water resistance works fine for everyday accidents like rain or sink splashes. Phones survive brief submersion when dropped near water, which is honestly what the IP rating is designed to protect against rather than deliberate underwater use.

iPhone 17 users will probably report similar experiences because the technology isn't meaningfully different. Maybe slightly fewer DOA units with seal defects due to improved manufacturing QC, but the average person won't notice real differences in water resistance between the two models.

Cost of Water Damage Repairs

Water damage repair for iPhone 16 runs $400-$600 if it's even repairable - lots of water-damaged phones are total losses requiring full replacement. That's a lot of money to lose because you thought IP68 meant you could actually use the phone underwater.

iPhone 17 repairs will cost about the same since the internal complexity is similar. Better water resistance might mean fewer phones need repairs to begin with, but when damage happens, you're paying the same painful prices either way.

Independent Testing Lab Results

Tech channels will eventually compare both phones in controlled water tests, and I'm betting the results are basically identical. Both phones probably survive rated conditions fine but start failing beyond specified depths or times.

iPhone 17 might show slightly more consistent results across multiple test units if manufacturing quality improved. But the differences won't be dramatic enough to change how you should actually treat the phone around water in daily use.

Practical Advice for Both Models

Treat water resistance on both phones as accident insurance, not a feature you actively use. Don't go swimming with either phone, don't take them in hot tubs, don't deliberately dunk them underwater just because you can.

If either phone gets wet, turn it off immediately, dry everything thoroughly, and wait at least 24 hours before plugging it in to charge. Same precautions apply to both models because the water resistance tech is fundamentally the same even if iPhone 17 has minor tweaks.

Should Water Resistance Influence Your Upgrade Decision?

If you're thinking about upgrading from iPhone 16 to 17 because of water resistance improvements, don't. The changes are way too minor to justify dropping another thousand bucks unless you've got money to burn and just want the latest model.

Both phones handle typical water scenarios adequately - you're not gaining meaningful protection upgrading between them. Unless Apple announces some major breakthrough in waterproofing tech for iPhone 17, this shouldn't factor into your upgrade decision at all.

The Bottom Line on Changes

iPhone 17 probably has marginally better water resistance than iPhone 16 through refined materials and tighter manufacturing tolerances. These small improvements help with long-term reliability as seals age but won't dramatically change real-world performance or how you should use the phone.

Treat both phones identically around water - assume the IP68 protects against accidents but don't push your luck. Any improvements in iPhone 17 are minor refinements, not revolutionary changes that make underwater phone use suddenly safe or recommended.

Apple iPhone 15 vs iPhone SE Specs Compared in Detail

Previous article iPhone 17 Water Resistance Leaks: How Deep Can It Go?
Next article iPhone 17 Concept Review: The Good, The Bad, and The Unlikely